Cynulliad Cenedlaethol Cymru |
National Assembly for Wales |
Pwyllgor yr Economi, Seilwaith a Sgiliau |
Economy, Infrastructure and Skills Committee |
Partneriaeth Sgiliau Rhanbarthol |
Regional Skills Partnerships |
EIS(5) RSP04 |
|
Ymateb gan Cadeirydd Clwstwr Bwyd a Ffermio, RLSP de-orllewin a Chanolbarth Cymru
|
Evidence from Food and Farming Cluster Chair, South West and Mid Wales Regional Learning and Skills Partnership |
I support the views submitted by the RLSP.
Additional response:
Information from
businesses can provide a more immediate reflection of the working
environment than the methods outlined by the RLSP submission.
I support the views submitted by the RLSP
Additional response:
As the incoming Chairman of the Food and Farming cluster, there is an additional opportunity to engage with major employers in the geographical area, who supply our business. I appreciate that it is not always possible for them to attend the meetings, therefore having dialogue in a broader supply chain context will be a priority. Essentially, their efficacy to attract and retain staff upstream of the supply chain, has repercussions to all downstream stakeholders.
The challenge is to have qualitative data that represents the needs of the entire geographical area. Businesses will broadly agree and submit the same requirements, however local needs to the North may be different to those in the South and can be influenced by the training provision of the tertiary colleges, or the availability of work based training providers.
Consequently it is important to have broad geographical representation.
I support the views submitted by the RLSP
Additional response:
The City Deal and Growth Deal in Mid Wales should herald significant opportunities in the relevant areas. However of the eleven projects highlighted in the Swansea City Deal, there is no explicit food production or manufacturing scheme. Nevertheless if the projected 10,000 jobs are generated, there will be an associated increase in spend at retailers and hospitality providers. This in itself should provide growth opportunities for the food and farming sector to take advantage of.
The Food and Farming sector needs to consider this opportunity and ensure that skilled staff are available to work in supporting the growth of the eleven key projects.
The proposed growth deal for rural Mid Wales, on the other hand, should include food and farming as a key driver for growth. Improvements in the transport infrastructure and digital connectivity should help develop growth opportunities and support the creation of an estimated 4000 jobs.
Key training
providers for food manufacturing and farming skills are based in
the Mid Wales region. The Food Park in Horeb, Llandyssul, is well
placed to continue to develop as a learning and development hub
and, I would suggest, be key to developing the sector in the event
of a Mid Wales Deal. Likewise LANTRA are based in Builth Wells and
companies, such as Cambrian Training, in Welshpool.
I support the views submitted by the RLSP
Additional response:
The role of the RSLP Food and Framing cluster group can highlight specific training needs that sit outside the conventional apprentice pathways. Many items of specialised manufacturing machinery, that are usually manufactured in mainland Europe, require bespoke training.
The group can collate data on specialist training and, schemes such as the LANTRA managed Food Skills Cymru, can provide funding for groups of companies to consolidate their training, thus reducing the cost.
The lack of
specialist food engineers has been an issue for numerous years.
Cross-cluster communication and collaboration should highlight
different career paths for skilled workers. For example, we live in
uncertain times with the apparent demise of the UK car
manufacturing sector. Data from the RLSP Employment & Skills
Plan identifies the employment profile in each sector, and should
be a guide to signpost qualified employees from one sector to
another.
I support the views submitted by the RLS
I support the views submitted by the RLSP
Additional response:
Companies supplying the public sector must aim to work towards the goals of The Well Being of Future Generation Act, 2015.
One stipulation is that Welsh language is protected. To meet this aim an option of delivery of training through the medium of Welsh needs to be adhered too.
However, a pragmatic
approach must also be adopted, and businesses must evaluate any
additional costs.
I support the views submitted by the RLSP
I support the views submitted by the RLSP
It is important to promote to secondary school pupils that the food sector is a vibrant supply chain, employing 18% or so of the Welsh workforce. There are a diversity of roles, from dairy farming through to accountancy and engineering.
There are existing initiatives that aim to promote the sector to school pupils. The Tasty Careers project attends numerous skills fairs, career fairs and have recently had their Tasty Challenge project approved by the WJEC as a Key Stage 4, Welsh Baccalaureate skills project.
In times of
uncertainty regarding migrant workers, businesses in our sector
must work harder to develop relationships with local schools
through initiatives such as the Business in The Community (BiTC),
‘Business Class’ project.
I support the views submitted by the RLSP
Additional response:
Entry level jobs are usually the most difficult to fill and, generally, take the longest to develop the skills required to work in the sector. It is felt that once an apprentice has completed level 3, the level of competency required to complete level 4 is easier to bridge.
The essential skill
element of the Level 2 and 3 apprenticeships can be off-putting to
many potential signatories. Many potential apprentices have
finished full time education in order to develop the non-academic
skills required in the work place, and have no desire to return to
the classroom for non-work related activities. Employers prefer to
employ staff with the ability to perform the allocated task, and
not necessarily for their digital literacy skills.
I support the views submitted by the RLSP
I support the
views submitted by the RLSP
Are there any aspects of the
policy that are not working well, have there been any unintended
consequences, and what improvements can be
made?
I support the views submitted by the RLSP